When:    July 10th | 2025      Attend

Most User Access Reviews (UARs), especially in SOX-scope applications and other regulated environments like SAP, Oracle, and Workday, are performed to meet compliance requirements — not because they drive meaningful security outcomes. They’re repetitive, rubber-stamped, and void of risk context.

This session will explore how to bring real value into the UAR process. Instead of treating it like a checkbox exercise, we’ll show how to align reviews with business risk, improve review accuracy, and give reviewers the context they need to make better decisions — all without overloading them.

You’ll learn how to:

• Improve the efficiency of UARs by focusing reviews on high-risk access
• Close the gap between compliance and security with smarter, risk-informed decisions
• Simplify the reviewer experience to reduce friction and avoid rubber-stamping

If you’ve ever felt like your user access review process didn't lead to an improved security posture, this session will provide key lessons on meeting that objective.

Presenter

Jason Gzym is a seasoned expert in Identity Security with over 20 years of experience. As the leader of Pathlock’s global solution engineering and advisory team, he oversees solution design, pre-sales activities, and customer guidance on best practices and industry trends. Jason specializes in identity governance, strategy, and delivering scalable solutions that help organizations secure digital assets, ensure compliance, and empower users. A passionate advocate for innovation and collaboration, he actively contributes to the cybersecurity community, sharing knowledge and insights to address evolving challenges in the field.